abhijithajikumar In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Cities today are meticulously planned prior to their construction. This often includes the allocation of individual spaces for residential, commercial and educational buildings. Even though this arises some concomitant concerns, the tangible benefits of the same overshadow all downsides.
Some people believe that setting distinct institutions or establishments apart from one another has multiple practical challenges. Not only can this newer approach cause inconvenience to the citizens but also may raise the cost of living. When the distances between homes and schools or offices become considerable, both students and employees may lose their valuable time in the daily commute. This could also pressure families to invest in buying cars or scooters for easy access to various amenities. Therefore, this development in city planning could prove negative in certain ways.
Nonetheless, the idea of arranging similar buildings in specific areas is largely advantageous. Such strategies ensure effective allocation of various resources such as electricity and drainage networks for different building complexes as the requisites for each vary. Moreover, this could also promote community-building where like-minded people like educators, shop owners or employees congregate together to support and grow together. Furthermore, overtime, many places may transform into hubs of education or shopping hotspots which could give numerous options for the common people to choose from. Thus, the construction of similar establishments in one place is extremely beneficial for all.
In conclusion, nowadays, city planners leave separate spaces to accommodate various types of constructions. Despite of some people being discontent in the expect of minor inconveniences, the legitimate gains of this novel planning technique subside all drawbacks.
