abhijithajikumar Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels. Is this a positive or negative development?
Conventional sources are the most popular reserves of energy all over the world. Recently, many nations are exploring alternative modes to meet their energy demands. In this essay, I strongly contend this as a positive development owing to the dual benefits of the latter in both renewability and environmental impact.
Fossil fuels are derived from plants and animals that have died millions of years ago. With the present extraction rates, our fuel reserves would deplete in a few hundred years. Alternative energies that mainly consists of solar, tidal and wind energies are renewable, meaning that they will not be exhausted anytime in the future. Exploring and adapting to alternative sources have hence, become imperative for human existence. Many developed nations, for instance, promote renewable energies and have limited the import of crude oil and its derivatives.
Moreover, the newer energy forms do not pollute the environment in any way. Compared to its conventional counterparts which release hazardous gases to the atmosphere, they leave no traces of any by-products behind. If more nations adopt to these cleaner fuels, the air and water quality indices could be drastically improved. This is particularly true in highly populated cities like Delhi in India, where the government was pressured to promote cleaner energy forms when higher rates of vehicular emissions severely depleted Delhi’s air quality levels.
In conclusion, the world has recently witnessed a phenomenal shift in its energy consumption from conventional sources to alternative ones. In my perspective, I argue this trend to be an absolute necessity pointing to the availability and environmental facets.
