Some people believe that the government should spend on new public buildings such as libraries and museums rather than renovating old buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Governmental budget allocations for various projects are often considered based on their perceived impact.  Many are of the view that nations should prioritize the construction of new public infrastructures like libraries and museums while others emphasize the renovations of older buildings. I contend that though both are important, the former deserve the preference as they are the knowledge centers that shape the future community.

Proponents of modernizing previous establishments are concerned about the outlook of their place and the opportunities this could bring along. These people might want their nation to be projected with the best of facilities and appearances. Not only this can impress other nationals but also would increase the influx of tourists. This is particularly true given the fact that countries like UAE give special attention to the upgradations of their constructions with time and this has catalyzed their tourism sector to flourish.

Why should the government invest in building libraries and museums instead? in money is spent on such learning spaces, it could bring tangible benefits in the future. These institutions particularly aid the students to be molded into knowledgeable citizens as libraries promote a culture of reading and museums encourage historical and cultural awareness. In developing countries like India, for instance, has central libraries in each of its cities which are often the epicenter of learning for children and adults alike.

In conclusion, many people prefer government expending on renovating old buildings as to better their chances in attracting global attention; nonetheless, it is the libraries and museums that are worthier to spend the money on with their undeniable role in molding the society.

You may also like